The Long-Term Value of AI Adoption in Defense Contracts

In the sprawling corridors of the Pentagon, alongside decades-old protocols and famously complex procurement processes, a quiet revolution is unfolding. Artificial intelligence—once the domain of science fiction and Silicon Valley—has firmly established itself as the Department of Defense's technological darling. The marriage between military strategy and machine learning capabilities isn't just another fleeting Pentagon romance; it represents a fundamental shift in how America maintains its defensive edge in an increasingly complex global landscape.

The Pentagon's AI Spending Spree

When it comes to embracing new technologies, the DoD hasn't always been known for moving at lightning speed. Yet the numbers tell a compelling story of rapid adoption: defense spending on AI-related contracts skyrocketed from $190 million to $557 million in just one year. This dramatic uptick isn't merely the Pentagon finally discovering the Silicon Valley playbook; it represents a strategic pivot that recognizes AI as essential to future military capabilities.

The financial commitment becomes even more striking when we zoom out to the global perspective. The worldwide AI market in aerospace and defense is projected to surge from approximately $28 billion today to $65 billion by 2034, growing at a robust 9.91% compound annual growth rate. North America alone represents $10.43 billion of this market, with growth slightly outpacing the global average at 10.02% annually.

This investment trajectory reveals that the DoD isn't just dipping its toes in the AI waters—it's diving in headfirst. In 2022, when the newly formed Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office (CDAO) took over AI oversight, appropriations jumped dramatically from $10.3 million to $320.4 million in fiscal year 2023. That's the bureaucratic equivalent of going from "what's AI?" to "we can't live without it" in record time.

From Thunderforge to the Kill Chain: AI Programs Reshaping Defense

Behind the impressive spending figures are concrete initiatives transforming how the military operates. Perhaps no program better exemplifies this shift than "Thunderforge," the DoD's flagship for deploying AI agents in military operations. In March 2025, Scale AI secured a prime contract for this initiative, positioning itself at the forefront of integrating AI into military workflows.

According to the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU), which oversees the project, "Thunderforge signifies a critical transition towards AI-driven, data-centric warfare, enabling U.S. forces to swiftly and accurately address threats". In less technical terms, the DoD is betting big on AI to help commanders make faster and better decisions—because in modern warfare, hesitation can be costly.

These AI agents aren't merely digital assistants fetching information; they're sophisticated systems designed to conduct tabletop war games, predict outcomes, and "refine proposed courses of action". Picture a high-stakes chess match where AI helps strategize several moves ahead, except the board is a geopolitical landscape and the pieces represent actual military assets.

Meanwhile, the Pentagon is capitalizing on AI to speed up what it calls the "kill chain"—the process of identifying, tracking, and assessing threats. Dr. Radha Plumb, the Pentagon's Chief Digital and AI Officer, acknowledged that AI is providing a "significant advantage" in these domains, noting that generative AI is proving beneficial in planning and strategy stages.

If "kill chain" sounds ominous, rest assured that leading AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic maintain a firm stance against allowing their AI systems to inflict harm on humans. Think of it as teaching AI to play paintball rather than handing it live ammunition—although the analogy admittedly breaks down when considering real-world applications.

The New Defense Industry Hierarchy: AI Players Take Center Stage

Perhaps the most telling indicator of AI's transformative impact is the dramatic reshuffling of the traditional defense sector hierarchy. Consider Palantir Technologies, the AI-focused company named after a magical artifact from Lord of the Rings. Its stock soared approximately 55% in early 2025, after returning a massive 340% in 2024.

Meanwhile, traditional defense giants like Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and General Dynamics have been struggling, with their combined market value now lower than that of Palantir. It's as if the defense industry suddenly found itself in a high school movie where the nerdy tech kids have become more popular than the football team.

This shift hasn't gone unnoticed by the Pentagon, which awarded Palantir a $250 million contract to develop a data-sharing system. The collaboration marks a significant milestone in applying AI to military contracting, leveraging Palantir's expertise in data analytics to build a robust system facilitating real-time information exchange and decision-making.

Other AI-focused companies are also securing their place in the defense ecosystem. BigBear.ai, for instance, was awarded a position on the U.S. General Services Administration's OASIS+ (One Acquisition Solution for Integrated Services Plus) Unrestricted Multiple Agency Contract. This multiple-award IDIQ contract has no maximum dollar ceiling and offers a 10-year ordering period—essentially giving government customers an all-you-can-eat buffet of BigBear.ai solutions for the next decade.

From Strategy to Implementation: The AI Adoption Roadmap

The DoD isn't simply throwing money at AI and hoping for the best (though one could argue that's been a time-honored tradition with certain defense projects). In November 2023, it released a comprehensive AI adoption strategy outlining a plan to integrate AI across multiple military functions.

This strategy, specifically the "2023 DoD Data, Analytics, and AI Adoption Strategy," builds upon previous policy documents and places a major focus on speed, agility, learning, and responsibility. It emphasizes decentralized authority and the creation of tight feedback loops between developers and end-users—essentially recognizing that AI implementation isn't a one-size-fits-all proposition.

A key component of this strategy is the AI Hierarchy of Needs, which prioritizes high-quality data as the foundation for insightful analytics and responsible AI development. It's the military equivalent of acknowledging that even the smartest AI can't make chicken salad out of chicken feathers—you need solid data ingredients first.

Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Michael C. Horowitz has highlighted several key projects aimed at accelerating AI adoption within the DoD, including developing AI tools for contract writing, establishing data-sharing systems, and partnering with tech companies. In a military context known for its acronym soup, it's refreshing to see a straightforward approach to technology adoption.

The Economic Calculus: Long-Term Value Beyond Battlefield Advantage

Beyond enhancing military capabilities, AI adoption in defense contracting promises significant economic benefits. AI tools can drastically accelerate the contracting process by automating routine tasks and streamlining workflows, allowing contractors to focus on more strategic activities.

For taxpayers wondering if all this investment will pay off, consider that in the next five years, AI is expected to contribute a staggering $15 trillion to the global economy, with defense and aerospace sectors leading the way in adoption. That's not just Pentagon optimism; it's a recognition that AI's potential extends far beyond making military decisions faster.

The DoD's AI initiatives are also creating ripple effects throughout the defense industrial base. As the Pentagon shifts toward software, drones, and robots over traditional hardware, we could see a modernization of military procurement prioritizing innovation over convention. Elon Musk's cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) project has already sent tremors through the defense sector, with traditional contractor stocks taking hits as new players gain ground.

Navigating the Ethical Minefield

No discussion of military AI would be complete without addressing the elephant in the war room: ethical concerns. While Scale emphasized that Thunderforge AI will operate "under human oversight," this was the sole reference to safety from either party involved in the announcement.

This sparse attention to ethical guardrails has prompted concerns about yielding decision-making power to AI systems. As one Reddit commenter colorfully put it: "This is how the world concludes. Not with a loud explosion or a soft sigh, but with a series of beeps and boops". Another noted more soberly: "Entities that cannot be held responsible, such as AI, should not be entrusted with making operational decisions".

The DIU has attempted to clarify that the primary objective is to assist military leaders in analyzing and evaluating larger volumes of information, enabling faster decisions based on AI recommendations. It's less about Skynet taking control and more about enhancing human capabilities—at least for now.

Interestingly, not all corners of the defense world are rushing to embrace AI. Companies working as DoD contractors or state government contractors bound by security rules may be more hesitant to incorporate AI into their operations. The same applies to medical software and aviation software developers, where safety considerations often outweigh efficiency gains.

The Future Battlefield: Human-Machine Collaboration

As we look ahead, the question isn't whether AI will continue transforming defense contracting, but how quickly and in what ways. Despite fiscal challenges, AI remains a core component of the DoD's long-term strategy. The increasing number of private-sector AI contracts awarded by the Pentagon may indicate that while direct government funding faces constraints, AI development is increasingly being outsourced to private companies.

This hybrid approach likely represents the future of defense AI: a collaboration between government direction and private sector innovation. Rather than building everything in-house, the DoD is leveraging the expertise of companies at the cutting edge of AI development.

In this evolving landscape, the military is learning that the greatest value comes not from replacing human judgment with artificial intelligence, but from creating systems where each enhances the other's capabilities. The most effective battlefield of the future won't be one where machines have replaced soldiers, but where human intuition and machine precision work in harmony.

The true long-term value of AI in defense contracts may ultimately lie in this balanced approach—one that recognizes both the tremendous potential of artificial intelligence and the irreplaceable qualities of human judgment. As one military strategist might put it: in the chess game of global security, the winning move isn't choosing between human or machine, but learning how to play as a centaur.

And for a bureaucracy that still sometimes relies on floppy disks for certain operations, that's a remarkably forward-thinking perspective. The Pentagon may move with the speed of an aircraft carrier rather than a speedboat, but when it commits to a new direction, the resulting momentum creates waves that reshape entire industries. The AI revolution in defense has only just begun—and its long-term value promises to extend far beyond the bottom line of defense contracts.

HighsideAI

At HighsideAI, we are experts are DevOps and deploying highly available, scalable and completely secure AI infrastructure and tools. Contact us at info@highside.ai if you want to start deploying your AI capabilities today.